Tuesday, September 19, 2017

Report: O’Reilly Team Shopped Negative Story on Accuser

Perquita Burgess, Bill O'Reilly
LawNewz.com has confirmed that Bill O’Reilly‘s team is behind a negative story regarding one of his accusers. It’s a story that Bill O’Reilly himself also tweeted out saying that he was “sorry to have to post this article.”

The negative piece involved Perquita Burgess, who claims she was sexually harassed by the former Fox News host in 2008 and says he called her “hot chocolate.” In 2015, she was reportedly arrested after a domestic incident. However, the details of the arrest were so flimsy that The Washington Post apparently refused to go with it after an extensive investigation. Instead, it was published in the conservative publication Newsmax, which claimed “[a] 2015 arrest by Detroit police of a key accuser of Bill O’Reilly for giving a false report of a crime has raised serious doubts as to her credibility.”


According to a report, Burgess is accused of calling the police on her then-boyfriend claiming that he hit her, and when police arrived, she basically recanted. However, since that time, Burgess’s then-boyfriend said he believed that the allegations were based “on a misunderstanding and were not pursued by the police or prosecutors.” The case was dropped.

“The Washington Post contacted me a few weeks ago, and the reporter there told me Mr. O’Reilly’s team approached him with new information his investigators had uncovered about Ms. Burgess,” attorney Lisa Bloom said in a statement to LawNewz.com “That reporter reviewed the matter extensively, including talking to me and reviewing a witness statement I provided that showed the domestic violence incident was based on a misunderstanding and that the incident did not result in any legal charges or conviction as far as we could tell. The Post ultimately passed on the story, presumably because it didn’t meet their editorial standards.”


O’Reilly’s attorney is sticking by the veracity of the story that Newsmax published.

“The facts outlined in the story stand on their own merits. The documents containing those facts are all a matter of public record.

No comments:

Post a Comment